Failure of the war on drugs

 

In 1998, the United Nations General Assembly special session (UNGASS) reviewed the existing global drug control policy and decided to continue with elimination and prohibition: to reduce the cultivation of the coca bush, the cannabis plant and the opium poppy by 2008, and to punish dealers and users.

In March 2009, the UNGASS meeting in Vienna admitted to losing the global war on drugs. The use of cannabis, cocaine, heroin and other drugs had not decreased, HIV/AIDS and hepatitis rates globally continue to escalate, trade often expanded, and crop spraying in Columbia and Bolivia threatened public health.

Existing policies have indirectly created “a criminal market of macro-economic size”, having an estimated value of $300 billion. They affect the health of users and result in the murder of thousands, including innocent bystanders, as drug cartels claim and defend economic turf. The U.S alone spends nearly $15 billion a year trying to eradicate the illicit drug trade.

Opposition to change comes from those who benefit - the prison industry, defence companies and paramilitary firms - as well as voters who regard drug trafficking and use as a criminal activity. If the war on producers, sellers and users has failed, what can be done?

Antonia Maria Costa, head of the UN Office on drugs and crime believes that we still need law enforcement. “But the heart of the matter is to bring back health, prevention and treatment to the centre of drug control.” Replace fear, prejudice and punitive prohibitions with common sense, science, public health and human rights.”

Eight years ago, Portugal decriminalized marijuana, cocaine and heroin. It has enabled them to manage drug related problems more effectively and .the nightmare scenarios warned by decriminalization opponents have, quite plainly, never materialized.”

Should we criminalize, eradicate, prohibit, assist or legalize? What is the best way to remove the greed and the profit motive for the growers and the cartels, and to assist those endangered by physical and existential pain? The problem is multi-faceted, affecting people directly and indirectly all across society. There are numerous questions, few clear answers and much to deliberate on. Whatever the course of action of our own government or of international bodies, we can expect controversy, opposition, and difficulties along the way – fitting right in with the times!

 

March 26, 2009

TO PRINT News on Society What's new ?

© New Acropolis Canada